1000wordpics.blogspot.com Website Review

Having hands on-used all three full-frame systems, some thoughts in no particular order: attracting users from their respective ecosystems. At first glance this would seem like Sony has the bets momentum of the three, but my personal feeling is that Sony is preliminary taking the less tightly attached. Canon users are generally in their system for the EF L-series lenses and for the known quantity of the the Canon colour rendition. Nikon users generally stay within the system for autofocus systems of the field; the reason why its not swaying more users from Canon and Nikon camps is because the users from the latter are looking for DSLR-levels of phase detection AF performance. Mirrorless sensor-based PDAF systems have come a long way but still are not match for the the likes of the best dedicated subsystems seen in higher end DSLR's. common to see EF lenses mounted on adapters to Sony bodies, but there seems to be a hard core contingent of Nikon users out there that are hoping that a second and future iteration of the Nikon Z-mount will give them what they are looking for in AF performance. job with the menu system, which had already migrated to a touch interface by the time of the consumer-level D5500, but the traditional the car manufacturers took took the traditional PRND automatic gearshift control and started to experiment with different control diameters, but in actual fact the benefits are nothing new. Leica makes a big deal out of the quality of their lenses, but a lot of the sharpness comes from the design possibilities of having the lens exist pupil closer to the sensor plane. If you compare Leica M lenses versus overall size of the mount (and lens exit pupil) are fairly large relative to sensor area. launch, but the Japanese companies are on quicker product cycles and will have move the game on within two years. You can't justify the price premium of a Leica M, and that became harder with each subsequent entry into full-frame mirrorless.